Adverse economic effect of decision gives standing under AD(JR) Act
In Argos Pty Ltd v Corbell [2014] HCA 50, the High Court held that an applicant whose profitability would be affected by a decision had standing under the AD(JR) Act.
CommBar Sections
- ADR (29)
- Asia Practice (6)
- Banking and Finance (38)
- Building and Construction Law (53)
- Civil Procedure (21)
- Class Actions (14)
- Competition and Consumer Law (22)
- Contracts, Restitution and General Commercial Law (7)
- Corporations and Securities Law (16)
- Energy (19)
- Environment and Planning (2)
- Equity (22)
- Insolvency Law (48)
- Insurance and Professional Negligence (13)
- International Law (7)
- IP and Trade Practices (98)
- Media Law (5)
- Property and Probate (5)
- Public Law (36)
- Sports Law (15)
- Superannuation (1)
- Uncategorised (2)
Latest Updates
-
Penny Harris says:Thanks Sarah - this article was not only interesting and informatively...
-
Jeff Koelewyn says:
- additional damages arbitration Article Australia bankruptcy Case Note causation civil penalties Civil Procedure commercial arbitration conference constitution contempt of court copyright copyright infringement Corporations Act costs Court of Appeal damages directors' liability disclosure discovery duty of care energy enforceability estoppel Federal Court fiduciary duties guarantees High Court infringement injunction international arbitration legislative change litigation misleading conduct mortgage patents penalties reform settlement Supreme Court Trade marks unconscionable conduct VCAT