PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURITIES REGISTER (PPSR) – Applicant registered security interest in collateral (helicopter) – helicopter stolen and sold to other party – other party on-sold helicopter to third party and applied to register financing change statement to end applicant’s interest – meaning of “security interest” – decision affirmed
When competition and criminal law collide. This case note discusses the interlocutory appeal in Country Care Group v CDPP, in which the Full Court of the Federal Court considered the complexity of criminal prosecutions for cartel offences and the need to direct juries about alternative pathways to conviction.
The Supreme Court of Victoria dismisses a judicial review of a council finding that the Bald Hills Wind Farm was creating an acoustic nuisance affecting neighbouring residents.
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Jams 2 Pty Ltd v Stubbings provides much-needed clarification regarding the test for statutory unconscionability in the wake of the High Court’s split decision in ASIC v Kobelt.
In a joint judgment, a Full Court of five members (Allsop CJ, Kenny, Besanko, Mortimer and Moshinsky JJ) held that the power in s 501 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to refuse to grant a visa can be used to refuse an application for a protection visa, even if the applicant otherwise satisfies the protection visa criteria.
A recent judgment of O’Callaghan J confirms that rental expenses incurred during the statutory ‘no liability’ period following an administrator’s appointment may be afforded priority in a subsequent winding up, despite the fact that the administrators are not personally liable for those expenses.
This piece looks at the question raised by Dental Corporation’s application for special leave to appeal to the High Court: did the Federal Court have jurisdiction to make a declaration about the application of subsection 12(3) of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth)?
Ever since the decision of Crosby v Kelly (2012) 203 FCR 451, the Federal Court has become, in many respects, the jurisdiction du jour for defamation litigants throughout Australia.
How did we get here? Who can go there? How? And why would you want to? This article seeks to answer these questions.
The New South Wales Court of Appeal has allowed an appeal against orders for distribution from a co-mingled fund held by insolvent entities and, in doing so, has provided guidance for liquidators and creditors alike on the various methods for distribution and the principles of tracing.
The New South Wales Court of Appeal recently revisited the principles relevant to determining the scope of an arbitration clause in overturning the decision of the NSWSC granting a stay in favour of arbitration.
The Supreme Court of Victoria has added to the growing jurisprudence regarding search engines and liability for third-party publications, including when sharing hyperlinks to that content, awarding criminal law solicitor George Defteros $40,000 in damages for defamation.
A unanimous (five Justice) High Court approval of the apprehended bias test in Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy. Three Justice majority conclusions about the application of the Ebner test, and the requirement of materiality in a jurisdictional error before a decision will be invalidated.
Mr George Defteros is a solicitor specialising in criminal law. He acted for a number of defendants to criminal charges arising out of Melbourne’s Gangland wars of the 80s and 90s.
He sued Google LLC for defamation arising out the results of searches made available by Google’s search engine.
The Supreme Court of Victoria has determined to enforce part of an arbitration award under the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic), while refusing to enforce other parts where the reasons were inadequate and which also failed to identify a specific and ascertainable award amount.